We will lose several vocational courses. Fewer people will be able to quality for a job. Unemployment will rise and tax rates could, too.
We would have to stop offering interview coaching. Some people will take longer to find work and become financially vulnerable.
Less funding will reduce how far resources can be spread. People living in rural areas will miss opportunities.
No change to this budget allocation will mean that all current service levels will be maintained
We will expand courses to accommodate everyone who needs them. We project that local unemployment will fall below the national average.
We will add more advanced courses and evening classes, helping people in low-paid jobs to qualify for higher-paid ones.
We will be able to provide advanced courses to people in rural areas by subsiding their transport costs, creating more high-skill jobs.
There are no consequences to this change
There are no consequences to this change
There are no consequences to this change
There are no consequences to this change
Reductions in this area would mean less resources to support individual's and the need to implement a review process looking at the eligibility of a client and prioritising individuals needs over others, as well as increasing residency fees.
The selection and flexibility of services on offer would be minimised and potentially the quality of care would suffer without neglecting our legal responsibilities.
Less funding would mean a reduction in staff and visiting hours would have to be restricted, making it harder for families to spend time together.
No change to this budget allocation will mean that all current service levels will be maintained
Investment in this area would allow us to find suitable living environments and care arrangements for more individuals, helping them adapt to the tricky and sometimes emotional circumstances associated to deteriorating health or that of a family member.
Nursing homes could be equipped with more medical equipment so individuals don't have to go far a field to find homes that can support their health needs.
More schemes could be introduced which enable individuals to continue living at home with regular visits from trained nursing staff. This would ensure as little disruption to their normal day to day lives and easing the responsibility of care often placed on the friends family.
There are no consequences to this change
There are no consequences to this change
There are no consequences to this change
There are no consequences to this change
Extensive reductions in this area would make it difficult to address the issue of homelessness in the city at all. Vulnerable individuals would not receive the support required to keep them from becoming homeless and the existing homeless community would not receive the support they need to find housing. The numbers of people on the streets would increase dramatically.
Crime rates could increase as practical facilities and psychological aid is cut, leaving desperate individuals with few choices to places to go for support.
No change to this budget allocation will mean that all current service levels will be maintained
Reduced preventative action such as future planning workshops would leave vulnerable people without the practical advice they need to make positive changes.
More shelters to be opened to take in homeless individuals and offer volunteer run facilities to support them in the processes involved in securing housing.
Extensive reductions in funding would cause crime rates to increase dramatically with little to no structure for prevention.
Reductions in this area would mean fewer services and resources to work with high risk or vulnerable individuals and families (either as victims or offenders) and would lead to more negative impacts on neighbourhoods and communities.
Cuts in the number of crime prevention initiatives would mean Local neighbourhood action groups would have little to no support from the authorities.
No change to this budget allocation will mean that all current service levels will be maintained
Resources such as security cameras would have to be scaled back and potentially lead to higher crime rates.
Increased funding in this area would allow investment in extra security features like security cameras around areas with high crime rates.
Possible outcomes could include: Produce a regular resident newsletter on anti-social behaviour and crime prevention in English and other languages. Develop web-based anti-social behaviour reporting.
There are no consequences to this change
There are no consequences to this change
There are no consequences to this change
There are no consequences to this change
With cuts to resources in this area we could see national averages in secondary and later education drop.
Resources and healthcare for disabled children and those with special learning requirements will have to be cut.
The area's profile as a desirable place for families to live could suffer as facilities for early education are reduced.
No change to this budget allocation will mean that all current service levels will be maintained
Nurseries and day care centres will close due to lack of funding, and those which stay open will become overcrowded.
Investment would allow more free nurseries and childcare facilities State wide, allowing more families to benefit from early years education
Grants and financial support would be available for healthcare, learning support and family counselling for those with disabled children or special circumstances.
There are no consequences to this change
There are no consequences to this change
There are no consequences to this change
There are no consequences to this change